How Did We Get There? The History Of KAVEH MEMARI Told Through Tweets

f:id:KavehMemari:20190602194101j:plain

There has sure been great deal of suitable innovation born from army technology, maybe it's too bad that we haven't attained such amazing technical advancements without the actual battle component. Okay so, let's discuss this for a minute and also concern terms with this from historic and also thoughtful point of view shall we?

If one puts in the time to check out Giulo Douhet's publication "The Command of the Air" - which is still available with the College of Alabama Press released in 2009, ISBN: 978-0-8173-5608-8 - a re-printed from Giulio Douhet's 1929 job - after that they will certainly immediate see from his journal of ideas from his work on the battlefield that the military modern technology of human problem is alive as well as well, not only in his day - but likewise in our more modern-day era. Undoubtedly, there is still even more to find.

Under of page 26 the writer talks with the future of war modern technology as a "constant advancement" on a chart, and nearly appears to speak of an inflection-point concept where the cosign wave or military technology goes down totally and also begins again with a new paradigm as a result of the capability of airplane to relocate regardless of terrain in a 3D room. Bear in mind aircraft had actually simply involved the field of battle in his day and also changed the face of war for life.

Okay so I would love to ask this question of the armed forces planners, tactical thinkers, as well as dreamers of war technology today:

A.) Does that graph include a de-escalation of battle, such as with the cold-war, or a time in the future when there is no battle?

B.) It should, should not it?

That is to state will certainly there be a future time when human wars disappear. I think so, I really do. Why you ask? Well, simply due Kaveh Memari to the fact that rationally as well as essentially they just don't make sense. Why subject your human being to future battles, triggering devastation, and strife of a population only to have that group of people rise in the next generation to provide their concept of an ideal mutual action? See that factor.

Equally as the dry run circumstances of MAD - Mutual Assured Destruction identified that a nuclear exchange was unthinkable and also there would certainly be no champion, one could ask; is there ever a victor in wartime? Truly, a clear victory, no, not truly, and victory doesn't seem to last permanently. Therefore, what this informs me is that commonly the most effective option is to not play.